Make your mark Justice Browne-Marke!
By Frederick James
The appointment of Justice Nicholas Colin Browne-Marke as the Acting Chief Justice of Sierra Leone was met with great optimism and expectations. His reputation preceding his assumption of this esteemed position, heralded a new era of reform and progress within the judiciary. Indeed, since assuming office, Acting Chief Justice Browne-Marke has garnered praise for his commitment to dispensing justice fairly and efficiently across the country. His efforts to rebrand and build a positive image for the judiciary has not gone unnoticed, with many commending his work, in contrast to his predecessor’s shortcomings.
However, amidst the commendable strides being made by the Acting Chief Justice, there exist certain challenges that threaten to undermine the progress achieved thus far. The judiciary, like other public and private institutions, is not immune to having individuals with ulterior motives, whose actions could jeopardize the integrity and efficiency of the legal system. This is particularly evident in cases where justice is delayed, leading to frustration and potential setbacks for those seeking resolution through the courts.
Two such cases, currently pending in the Courts of Appeal, stand out as stark examples of the need for urgent attention and resolution. The matters between the State versus Randa Skeiky and Jaffer Zeghir versus Leonoil Company Limited have languished in the judicial system for over three years, much to the dismay of the aggrieved parties. The delay in delivering judgment or ruling on these cases not only tests the patience of the complainants, but also poses a risk of derailing their investments and livelihoods.
The apparent strategy of the Courts of Appeal to defer calling these cases, even after the stipulated 90-day period, raises concerns about the application of the principle that “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.” It calls into question the efficiency and transparency of the legal process, and highlights the need for a thorough review of the systems and procedures in place to ensure timely resolution of legal disputes.
The implications of such delays extend beyond the immediate parties involved in these cases. They reflect broader systemic issues within the Sierra Leone Justice System that require urgent reforms. The lack of expediency in addressing legal matters not only erodes public trust in the judiciary, but also hampers the ability of individuals, especially those without significant influence or resources, to seek redress through the legal system.
The Acting Chief Justice, in his capacity as the head of the judiciary, bears a responsibility to address these challenges and uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and accountability. It is imperative that he investigates the reasons behind the delays in the aforementioned cases and take corrective measures to expedite the resolution process. Transparency and communication with the aggrieved parties are essential to maintaining trust and confidence in the legal system.
Moreover, these cases serve as a poignant reminder of the urgent need for comprehensive reforms aimed at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the Sierra Leone Justice System. The quest for justice should not be hindered by bureaucratic hurdles or undue delays. Every citizen, regardless of their status or background, deserves prompt and impartial resolution of legal disputes.
The plight of individuals like Jaffer Zeghir and Alie Abess, underscores the importance of a justice system that operates swiftly and fairly. The Acting Chief Justice must prioritize the timely resolution of these cases and address any systemic shortcomings that impede the delivery of justice. Only through a commitment to transparency, accountability, and reform can the Sierra Leone judiciary fulfill its mandate of upholding the rule of law and serving the interests of all citizens. Justice delayed must not become justice denied. Justice Nicholas Colin Browne-Marke should continue making his mark in transforming the judiciary.