Unravelling the Web of Government-CRSG Agreements, Allegations of Mafia Deals, and Citizens’ Burden

By Mackie M Jalloh

Sierra Leone, a country grappling with economic, political, and social challenges, is facing a new predicament – the tollgate issue. The tollgates, initially implemented to contribute to infrastructure development, have become a contentious point, leaving citizens burdened and frustrated. This article aims to dissect the complexities of the tollgate agreement between the government and CRSG, shedding light on the increased toll fees and the apparent lack of transparency and accountability.

One of the primary concerns voiced by citizens revolves around the proximity of toll gates. With toll gates spaced a mere 27km apart, citizens traversing long distances regularly feel the weight of increased toll fees, which have surged by over 200%. This not only adds financial strain, but also raises questions about the government’s commitment to its citizens’ well-being.

A cornerstone of any successful governance is transparency and accountability. Unfortunately, suspicions and frustrations grow, as citizens question whether the toll revenues are being reinvested in road improvements and infrastructure. The government’s failure to disclose the amount collected, further fuels mistrust, leaving citizens in the dark about the utilization of their hard-earned money.

CRSG’s Broken Commitments:

The tollgate agreement between the government and CRSG included promises to enhance road aesthetics by installing street lights and trees along the middle of the roads. However, citizens and civil society organizations are disappointed, as CRSG falls short of fulfilling these commitments. This neglect not only violates the agreement, but also reflects poorly on the integrity and dedication of CRSG to the people of Sierra Leone.

Distance Agreement Discrepancies:

Research suggests that tollgates should ideally be spaced 60km apart for optimal efficiency. However, Sierra Leone has opted for a mere 27km interval, with plans for three toll gates instead of the recommended two. The failure to complete this infrastructure project in line with agreed-upon distances, raises concerns about the government and CRSG’s commitment to delivering efficient and well-maintained roads.

Minister of Works Disclosure Of Unavailable Documents:

The Minister of Works, responsible for overseeing the tollgate operations, has failed to provide crucial information about the amount collected from tax payments at the tollgates. This lack of transparency only adds to the frustration felt by citizens, who deserve to know how their money is being used for the betterment of their country.

The recent disclosure by the Minister of Works and Public Assets, Dr. Dennis Sandy, adds another layer to the growing discontent. The lack of transparency in managing the Wellington-Masiaka Road, highlighted by the absence of crucial documents, such as audited financial statements and traffic data, raises serious questions about the government’s oversight.

Clause 10.4 of the agreement allows for toll tariff adjustments, based on a review of base traffic data, adds complexity to the situation, with Dr. Sandy revealing that this critical information is currently unavailable to the government. This lack of access to essential data puts the government at a disadvantage, further fuelling suspicions of hidden deals.

Government’s Alleged Subjugation to China:

The government’s perceived disregard for its citizens’ concerns and focus on opaque deals, has sparked accusations of subduing itself to the government of China. Allegations of unaccountable and questionable agreements cast a shadow on the government’s priorities and commitment to the well-being of its citizens.

Conclusion:

Sierra Leone’s tollgate issue goes beyond a simple matter of collecting fees; it delves into transparency, accountability, and the government’s commitment to its people. As citizens bear the brunt of increased toll fees and broken promises, it is crucial for the government and CRSG to address these concerns, rectify discrepancies, and prioritize the well-being of the nation over questionable agreements. Only through open dialogue and genuine commitment can Sierra Leone pave the way for a more transparent and accountable governance.